<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for G-Loaded!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.g-loaded.eu/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu</link>
	<description>An open-source software and technology related journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The importance of regular data backups by George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2010/02/27/regular-data-backups/#comment-12238</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1535#comment-12238</guid>
		<description>Hi Giorgos.

Fortunately, every piece of data was recovered successfully. My initial decision to experiment with bootrec.exe at the most critical moment of this incident instead of using a tool I have used in the past and trust (Testdisk) made me very skeptical about how I handle situations like this. Also, I should have followed some standard procedures like creating an image of the whole disk before trying any kind of data recovery.

As for skipping daily backups without reason, I can assure you that this is an unexplained behavior of mine too! During the last years, I&#039;ve written numerous backup scripts, but I always focused on some machines I used as servers. Backing up my desktop or laptop had always been a low priority task. But, I&#039;ll set some new priorities from now on.

Also, I think I will have to reduce the number of computers that lay around at home to the absolute minimum. That should make things more clear regarding which kind of data is important and which is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Giorgos.</p>
<p>Fortunately, every piece of data was recovered successfully. My initial decision to experiment with bootrec.exe at the most critical moment of this incident instead of using a tool I have used in the past and trust (Testdisk) made me very skeptical about how I handle situations like this. Also, I should have followed some standard procedures like creating an image of the whole disk before trying any kind of data recovery.</p>
<p>As for skipping daily backups without reason, I can assure you that this is an unexplained behavior of mine too! During the last years, I&#8217;ve written numerous backup scripts, but I always focused on some machines I used as servers. Backing up my desktop or laptop had always been a low priority task. But, I&#8217;ll set some new priorities from now on.</p>
<p>Also, I think I will have to reduce the number of computers that lay around at home to the absolute minimum. That should make things more clear regarding which kind of data is important and which is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The importance of regular data backups by Giorgos Keramidas</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2010/02/27/regular-data-backups/#comment-12237</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgos Keramidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1535#comment-12237</guid>
		<description>Ouch! At least you found a way to recover your important files.

I try to keep daily backups of my laptop (pretty much the only machine left around here).  But I&#039;m also guilty of often skipping the daily backups for 5-6 days in a row.  I &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; that this is a silly thing to do, but I still do it.  To make things &#039;easier&#039; I have scripted my backup process, so all it takes is a daily run of:

&lt;code&gt;sudo /root/backup.sh 1&lt;/code&gt;

for a full level 1 dump of all my partitions, and

&lt;code&gt;sudo /root/backup.sh 2&lt;/code&gt;

for a level 2 incremental dump of all the files modified since the last level 1 dump.

Yet, I still skip some backups.  Go figure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! At least you found a way to recover your important files.</p>
<p>I try to keep daily backups of my laptop (pretty much the only machine left around here).  But I&#8217;m also guilty of often skipping the daily backups for 5-6 days in a row.  I <em>know</em> that this is a silly thing to do, but I still do it.  To make things &#8216;easier&#8217; I have scripted my backup process, so all it takes is a daily run of:</p>
<p><code>sudo /root/backup.sh 1</code></p>
<p>for a full level 1 dump of all my partitions, and</p>
<p><code>sudo /root/backup.sh 2</code></p>
<p>for a level 2 incremental dump of all the files modified since the last level 1 dump.</p>
<p>Yet, I still skip some backups.  Go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High CPU usage while running CentOS as guest on Virtualbox or VMware by Brian Nesbitt</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/12/18/high-cpu-usage-centos-guest-virtualbox-vmware/#comment-12235</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Nesbitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1500#comment-12235</guid>
		<description>For some reason this worked for me.  I have the same config, running VB on my host (windows 7 RC 64bit) and running centos 5.2 as the guest.  With just the one guest running, my E6700 was always at least 40% used.

http://tech.shantanugoel.com/2009/07/07/virtualbox-high-cpu-usage-problem-solved.html

I created a dummy windows guest vbox and gave it 4 MB disk and 4 MB ram.  I boot it from an empty CD and let it sit at the &quot;FATAL: No bootable medium found! System halted.&quot; screen.

As soon as I run this, my VirtualBox.exe process goes down 0% CPU.  Whenever I don&#039;t have it running, it hovers around 40% on my E6700.

Easy solution.  Not sure why it works, but hope it helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason this worked for me.  I have the same config, running VB on my host (windows 7 RC 64bit) and running centos 5.2 as the guest.  With just the one guest running, my E6700 was always at least 40% used.</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.shantanugoel.com/2009/07/07/virtualbox-high-cpu-usage-problem-solved.html" rel="nofollow">http://tech.shantanugoel.com/2009/07/07/virtualbox-high-cpu-usage-problem-solved.html</a></p>
<p>I created a dummy windows guest vbox and gave it 4 MB disk and 4 MB ram.  I boot it from an empty CD and let it sit at the &#8220;FATAL: No bootable medium found! System halted.&#8221; screen.</p>
<p>As soon as I run this, my VirtualBox.exe process goes down 0% CPU.  Whenever I don&#8217;t have it running, it hovers around 40% on my E6700.</p>
<p>Easy solution.  Not sure why it works, but hope it helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle Makes Commitments on MySQL, The Commission Welcomes by JhezeR</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/12/14/oracle-makes-commitments-on-mysql-the-commission-welcomes/#comment-12234</link>
		<dc:creator>JhezeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1502#comment-12234</guid>
		<description>Good commitments...
[Keep Share]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good commitments&#8230;<br />
[Keep Share]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ping.py &#8211; Python Implementation of the ping command by George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/30/python-ping/#comment-12228</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1408#comment-12228</guid>
		<description>@James: Your explanation was helpful for me and will probably be for all the readers of this post. Thanks for writing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James: Your explanation was helpful for me and will probably be for all the readers of this post. Thanks for writing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ping.py &#8211; Python Implementation of the ping command by James</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/30/python-ping/#comment-12226</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1408#comment-12226</guid>
		<description>Just so you know all ping commands have the restriction.  If you do an ls -l on the ping command on any *nix system, you will find the following

-rwsr-xr-x  1 root root 35108 Jun 15  2004 /bin/ping

Note the s in the permissions.  Ping is setUID root.  This allows unprivileged users the ability to use ping.  Why this is done is because ping (ICMP) require that the interface be placed into a listening mode, which requires root privileges to do.  Additionally ICMP itself is a low level protocol requiring root privilege.  With ping you are working at the hardware level.  With something like a web browser you are working much higher in the food chain.  

Is this a security problem, yes, which is why your python ping requires root.  This is also why systems using busybox usually don&#039;t allow normal users to do ping as setting ping setUID root can set all of the busybox commands setUID root.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know all ping commands have the restriction.  If you do an ls -l on the ping command on any *nix system, you will find the following</p>
<p>-rwsr-xr-x  1 root root 35108 Jun 15  2004 /bin/ping</p>
<p>Note the s in the permissions.  Ping is setUID root.  This allows unprivileged users the ability to use ping.  Why this is done is because ping (ICMP) require that the interface be placed into a listening mode, which requires root privileges to do.  Additionally ICMP itself is a low level protocol requiring root privilege.  With ping you are working at the hardware level.  With something like a web browser you are working much higher in the food chain.  </p>
<p>Is this a security problem, yes, which is why your python ping requires root.  This is also why systems using busybox usually don&#8217;t allow normal users to do ping as setting ping setUID root can set all of the busybox commands setUID root.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be cautious with Notepad++ by George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/17/be-cautious-with-notepad/#comment-12225</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1319#comment-12225</guid>
		<description>@Robert: I stare at the monitor and try to explain to myself why I didn&#039;t see this! :D

Thanks for letting me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert: I stare at the monitor and try to explain to myself why I didn&#8217;t see this! :D</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be cautious with Notepad++ by Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/17/be-cautious-with-notepad/#comment-12224</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1319#comment-12224</guid>
		<description>Um, there actually is a Windows port of gedit:
http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Windows
Don&#039;t know how well it works, I&#039;ve never tried it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, there actually is a Windows port of gedit:<br />
<a href="http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Windows" rel="nofollow">http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Windows</a><br />
Don&#8217;t know how well it works, I&#8217;ve never tried it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ping.py &#8211; Python Implementation of the ping command by George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/30/python-ping/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1408#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, I really do not have an explanation about what you describe. I suspect that this happened because the time.clock() function was also used when attaching the timestamp to the ICMP packet just before sending, which, when done on Linux, does not provide adequate time resolution in order to calculate the time difference. But that&#039;s just a wild guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, I really do not have an explanation about what you describe. I suspect that this happened because the time.clock() function was also used when attaching the timestamp to the ICMP packet just before sending, which, when done on Linux, does not provide adequate time resolution in order to calculate the time difference. But that&#8217;s just a wild guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ping.py &#8211; Python Implementation of the ping command by chris hallman</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/10/30/python-ping/#comment-12220</link>
		<dc:creator>chris hallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=1408#comment-12220</guid>
		<description>You sir, are brilliant! 

I understand the change, however I don&#039;t understand how it corrected operation of the program. Initially, tcpdump showed packets were being sent but no responses were received and the resulting RTT was 0.0ms. Now, I see requests, responses and accurate RTT. How did your change correct all this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sir, are brilliant! </p>
<p>I understand the change, however I don&#8217;t understand how it corrected operation of the program. Initially, tcpdump showed packets were being sent but no responses were received and the resulting RTT was 0.0ms. Now, I see requests, responses and accurate RTT. How did your change correct all this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.169 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-11 23:32:20 -->
