<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running supervisor 3 on CentOS 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/</link>
	<description>An open-source software and technology related journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pim</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/#comment-19447</link>
		<dc:creator>Pim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=2263#comment-19447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Richard, that is just awesome!
Just wondering, is the EL6 supervisor package still maintained?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Richard, that is just awesome!<br />
Just wondering, is the EL6 supervisor package still maintained?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/#comment-19242</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=2263#comment-19242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard, your work is much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, your work is much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Marko</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/#comment-19241</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=2263#comment-19241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve rebuilt the latest supervisor for el/centos/sl6, the build is available at

http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/rmarko/supervisor/ 

Thanks for the instructions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rebuilt the latest supervisor for el/centos/sl6, the build is available at</p>
<p><a href="http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/rmarko/supervisor/" rel="nofollow">http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/rmarko/supervisor/</a> </p>
<p>Thanks for the instructions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/#comment-18878</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=2263#comment-18878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nils, thanks for your feedback. I had actually used the procedure you described (&lt;code&gt;rpm -i –nomd5&lt;/code&gt; to extract the srpm contents to the appropriate directories in the rpmbuild tree and then &lt;code&gt;rpmbuild -ba&lt;/code&gt; to create the packages), but in order to make it simpler for the readers I used the &lt;code&gt;rpmbuild --rebuild&lt;/code&gt; option in the post. That was a bad choice, because I completely forgot about the md5 issue in C5 and thus the instructions were not accurate. Thanks for pointing this out.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nils, thanks for your feedback. I had actually used the procedure you described (<code>rpm -i –nomd5</code> to extract the srpm contents to the appropriate directories in the rpmbuild tree and then <code>rpmbuild -ba</code> to create the packages), but in order to make it simpler for the readers I used the <code>rpmbuild --rebuild</code> option in the post. That was a bad choice, because I completely forgot about the md5 issue in C5 and thus the instructions were not accurate. Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Breunese</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2011/05/12/running-supervisor-3-on-centos-5/#comment-18877</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Breunese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=2263#comment-18877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for these instructions!

The fc16 rawhide package is no longer available, but I used http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm instead. (Once Fedora 16 is released, this link will probably also die, but you should be able to get the SRPM from the Fedora 16 release repository after that date.)

The rpmbuild --rebuild command also failed on our CentOS 5 build server with an MD5 error, which seems to be caused by the newer RPM format used in Fedora. As a workaround I used a combination of &#039;rpm -i --nomd5&#039; and &#039;rpmbuild -bb&#039; instead:

&lt;pre class=&quot;console&quot;&gt;
$ wget http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm
$ rpm -i --nomd5 supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm
$ rpmbuild -bb ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/supervisor.spec
&lt;/pre&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these instructions!</p>
<p>The fc16 rawhide package is no longer available, but I used <a href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm" rel="nofollow">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm</a> instead. (Once Fedora 16 is released, this link will probably also die, but you should be able to get the SRPM from the Fedora 16 release repository after that date.)</p>
<p>The rpmbuild &#8211;rebuild command also failed on our CentOS 5 build server with an MD5 error, which seems to be caused by the newer RPM format used in Fedora. As a workaround I used a combination of &#8216;rpm -i &#8211;nomd5&#8242; and &#8216;rpmbuild -bb&#8217; instead:</p>
<pre class="console">
$ wget <a href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm" rel="nofollow">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/16/source/SRPMS/supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm</a>
$ rpm -i --nomd5 supervisor-3.0-0.5.a10.fc16.src.rpm
$ rpmbuild -bb ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/supervisor.spec
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 189/204 objects using apc

Served from: www.g-loaded.eu @ 2013-06-19 17:06:51 -->