<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective data wiping with a single complete overwrite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/</link>
	<description>An open-source software and technology related journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/#comment-11664</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=863#comment-11664</guid>
		<description>Pádraig: thanks for taking the time to comment. I have posted the information on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/23/shred-changes-default-number-of-passes-to-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;separate post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pádraig: thanks for taking the time to comment. I have posted the information on a <a href="http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/23/shred-changes-default-number-of-passes-to-3/" rel="nofollow">separate post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pádraig Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/#comment-11662</link>
		<dc:creator>Pádraig Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=863#comment-11662</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just changed the default number of passes to 3 in shred:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=83ae1bdd44432055e2cb6cf1502d1cc0cd651746</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just changed the default number of passes to 3 in shred:<br />
<a href="http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=83ae1bdd44432055e2cb6cf1502d1cc0cd651746" rel="nofollow">http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=83ae1bdd44432055e2cb6cf1502d1cc0cd651746</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/#comment-11661</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=863#comment-11661</guid>
		<description>Michael: That is correct. There might be other techniques or tool sets that might be a bit more efficient than the ones used during the tests of this study, but I really doubt that there is a methodology that can do magic. Of course using shred to wipe data is not overkill. But, I also doubt that shred can delete all instances of documents that have been temporarily saved on the filesystem as backup copies, autosave copies, older versions of documents by various applications. Basically, what I care about most is that a simple dd command:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX
is more than enough to practically waste the data on the hard drive. Until now, there was always the uncertainity about the capabilities of the data recovery tools. I had never heard of such a study before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: That is correct. There might be other techniques or tool sets that might be a bit more efficient than the ones used during the tests of this study, but I really doubt that there is a methodology that can do magic. Of course using shred to wipe data is not overkill. But, I also doubt that shred can delete all instances of documents that have been temporarily saved on the filesystem as backup copies, autosave copies, older versions of documents by various applications. Basically, what I care about most is that a simple dd command:</p>
<p>dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX</p>
<p>is more than enough to practically waste the data on the hard drive. Until now, there was always the uncertainity about the capabilities of the data recovery tools. I had never heard of such a study before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Iatrou</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/#comment-11660</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Iatrou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=863#comment-11660</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems to me that showing that one&#039;s methodology or tools cannot accomplish something, doesn&#039;t prove that  it can&#039;t happen in general. Everyday we handle sensitive information, but very few are responsible for datasets large enough to be an overkill to use shred(1).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems to me that showing that one&#8217;s methodology or tools cannot accomplish something, doesn&#8217;t prove that  it can&#8217;t happen in general. Everyday we handle sensitive information, but very few are responsible for datasets large enough to be an overkill to use shred(1).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerebrux</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2009/01/22/effective-data-wiping-with-a-single-complete-overwrite/#comment-11659</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerebrux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=863#comment-11659</guid>
		<description>Oh my ! now its better.... I feel good now
Thaks a lot ...grate article...
I was wasting my time when dealing with multiple wipes for security reasons since I was too a believer of multiple overwrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my ! now its better&#8230;. I feel good now<br />
Thaks a lot &#8230;grate article&#8230;<br />
I was wasting my time when dealing with multiple wipes for security reasons since I was too a believer of multiple overwrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

