<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Disable IPv6 in Fedora and CentOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/</link>
	<description>An open-source software and technology related journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-19034</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-19034</guid>
		<description>Paul, thanks for your feedback.
Seems like a very clean way to disabe IPv6 functionality. Time permitting I&#039;ll do some research about it and update the article accordingly. However, I&#039;m quite certain that the &lt;code&gt;net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6&lt;/code&gt; key was not there at the time I wrote this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>Seems like a very clean way to disabe IPv6 functionality. Time permitting I&#8217;ll do some research about it and update the article accordingly. However, I&#8217;m quite certain that the <code>net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6</code> key was not there at the time I wrote this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-19033</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-19033</guid>
		<description>for Red Hat 6 (and CentOS 6) users:
According to following article it’s better to disable kernel ipv6 functionality as opose to removing the module:
http://www.proxar.co.uk/technical-forum/
Kind Regards,
Paul Preston</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for Red Hat 6 (and CentOS 6) users:</p>
<p>According to following article it’s better to disable kernel ipv6 functionality as opose to removing the module:<br />
<a href="http://www.proxar.co.uk/technical-forum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.proxar.co.uk/technical-forum/</a></p>
<p>Kind Regards,<br />
Paul Preston</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-16875</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-16875</guid>
		<description>Some nice info on IPv6.
If  you do not want IPv6 at this time,without jumping through hoops;
for RedHat/CentOS,add this to /etc/sysconfig/network.
NOZEROCONF=yes
This diables link-local on all interfaces.
If you decide to transition to IPv6,remove the directive,and your PC is still IPv6 ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some nice info on IPv6.<br />
If  you do not want IPv6 at this time,without jumping through hoops;<br />
for RedHat/CentOS,add this to /etc/sysconfig/network.</p>
<p>NOZEROCONF=yes</p>
<p>This diables link-local on all interfaces.<br />
If you decide to transition to IPv6,remove the directive,and your PC is still IPv6 ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-14381</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-14381</guid>
		<description>@bharath: Thanks for your feedback.
Does this method prevent the ipv6 module from loading entirely, even if an application requires it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bharath: Thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>Does this method prevent the ipv6 module from loading entirely, even if an application requires it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bharath vn</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-14309</link>
		<dc:creator>bharath vn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-14309</guid>
		<description>DISABLE IPV6 IN UBUNTU 9.10
gksu gedit /etc/default/grub
CHANGE THIS LINE:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=”quiet splash”
TO
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=”ipv6.disable=1 quiet splash”
THEN UPDATE GRUB:
sudo update-grub
TO TEST WITH TERMINAL:
ip a &#124; grep inet6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISABLE IPV6 IN UBUNTU 9.10<br />
gksu gedit /etc/default/grub</p>
<p>CHANGE THIS LINE:<br />
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=”quiet splash”</p>
<p>TO<br />
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=”ipv6.disable=1 quiet splash”</p>
<p>THEN UPDATE GRUB:<br />
sudo update-grub</p>
<p>TO TEST WITH TERMINAL:<br />
ip a | grep inet6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genius</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>good information though but a direct approach will be better, tricky though @Nicosx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good information though but a direct approach will be better, tricky though @Nicosx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-11607</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-11607</guid>
		<description>Hi Adrian, I haven&#039;t spent much time with the ipv6 internals. Actually, I have never bothered to set it up. I intend to do so though as soon as I can find some spare time. Thanks for your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adrian, I haven&#8217;t spent much time with the ipv6 internals. Actually, I have never bothered to set it up. I intend to do so though as soon as I can find some spare time. Thanks for your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-11577</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-11577</guid>
		<description>Naturally, my above statement is incomplete. The new api &#039;getaddrinfo&#039; seems to involve both ipv6 and ipv4. The old api &#039;gethostbyname&#039; only hits ipv4. So, applications that use the new api will incur a timeout, even if ipv6 is disabled in the kernel and throughout the system. I guess glibc should be smarter about it and not hit the ip6 stack if it is disabled. Alas, ip6 is the future, so it is starting to assert itself. I wonder why (at least in my case) do I get that stupid timeout on ipv6. Maybe because I have an old firewall/router between my box and the DNS server, firewall that only understands ipv6...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, my above statement is incomplete. The new api &#8216;getaddrinfo&#8217; seems to involve both ipv6 and ipv4. The old api &#8216;gethostbyname&#8217; only hits ipv4. So, applications that use the new api will incur a timeout, even if ipv6 is disabled in the kernel and throughout the system. I guess glibc should be smarter about it and not hit the ip6 stack if it is disabled. Alas, ip6 is the future, so it is starting to assert itself. I wonder why (at least in my case) do I get that stupid timeout on ipv6. Maybe because I have an old firewall/router between my box and the DNS server, firewall that only understands ipv6&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-11575</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-11575</guid>
		<description>My trouble is that using ipv6 renders DNS resolve incredibly slow. Strace shows the DNS request is sent both ipv4 and ipv6. Ipv4 returns immediately, while ipv6 times out, eventually. Waiting for this timeout on EACH DNS request is killing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trouble is that using ipv6 renders DNS resolve incredibly slow. Strace shows the DNS request is sent both ipv4 and ipv6. Ipv4 returns immediately, while ipv6 times out, eventually. Waiting for this timeout on EACH DNS request is killing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Notaras</title>
		<link>http://www.g-loaded.eu/2008/05/12/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-fedora-and-centos/#comment-11495</link>
		<dc:creator>George Notaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.g-loaded.eu/?p=477#comment-11495</guid>
		<description>So far, I haven&#039;t noticed any form of intelligent communication between the hardware and any OS. :-) I do not know if what you ask is possible, but, if it is, then I assume it will only happen after some manual configuration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, I haven&#8217;t noticed any form of intelligent communication between the hardware and any OS. :-) I do not know if what you ask is possible, but, if it is, then I assume it will only happen after some manual configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.137 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 17:17:11 -->

